Abstract

Memory, motor-control, attention, learning, navigation, emotion, and perception are among the foundations of cognitive neurosciences. For many years, these have been studied separately, as distinct functions (Fodor, 2000). Recently, several veins of research have lead to the idea that different cognitive faculties may be handled by similar neurocognitive mechanisms. Likewise, Buzsaki and Moser proposed that a range of interacting cell types (such as “place cells,” “grid cells” or “time cells”), which support navigation, may also play a role in memory (Buzsaki and Moser, 2013). Moreover, these prominent researchers have suggested that navigation and memory rely on two fundamental mechanisms: one that is more allocentric, related to representations of landmarks in the environment, and another that is egocentric, self-referenced (Buzsaki and Moser, 2013). Similarly to navigation, memory encompasses autobiographical memory, related to events that happened to the experiencer (self-referenced), and semantic memory of events that the experiencer “knows”. Perception may be taken from a self-referenced first-person-perspective or from a third-person-perspective. Correspondingly, in the affective plane, emotion may be self-referenced, reflecting the experiencer own-feelings, or may be dominated by a third-person-perspective, when the experiencer is absorbed in the life of others (Zinck, 2008). Another vein of research, which pointed to cross-modalities, relates to “mental-lines.” Experiments on mental number scaling in archaic cultures or children have revealed that humans represent numbers along a logarithmic scale, termed “mental-number-line” (Dehaene and Cohen, 1995; Dehaene et al., 1999, 2008). Human experience numbers according to the resolution of perception: the perceived resolution decreases as numbers increase, yielding logarithmic scale. Logarithmic distribution was shown to fit the relation between temporal-distance of the experiencer from the experience and memory retention (Rubin and Schulkind, 1997; Spreng and Levine, 2006). Moreover, cognitive performance was found to decrease logarithmically as temporal-distance to the event increased (Arzy et al., 2009a). Emotional expression was also found to be represented by a mental-magnitude-line (Holmes and Lourenco, 2011). It is proposed that these common patterns of magnitudes are related to the self-referenced (spatial) processing of the different domains. The temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) is believed to play a special role in these self-referenced magnitude-related processing. The TPJ was found to be implicated in processing the mental-number-line (Gobel et al., 2001) with respect to quantity, numbers, or spatial attention (Dehaene et al., 2003), and likewise may be involved in other mental-magnitude-lines. However, the TPJ is known to be involved in many self-referenced functions including agency, ownership, perspective-taking and autobiographical memory which are not necessarily related to magnitude (Blanke and Arzy, 2005). Likewise, in a couple of investigation of the mental-time-line (Arzy et al., 2009b), activation at the right TPJ showed a symmetrical distribution of brain activity as a function of the temporal-distance of events from the present time: activation was increased for closer events than for more distant events (both in past and future). The TPJ was also found to play a special role in coordinating the relation between one's self-location in space and different external reference points (Ruby and Decety, 2001; Vogeley and Fink, 2003). In the personal/social domain, the TPJ was found to coordinate the relation between mentalizing oneself and others (Lombardo et al., 2010). Taken together, this suggests that different aspects of the subjective experience should be regarded in relation to the experiencing self. Self-related mentalization may have a specific logarithmic pattern, reflected as a “mental-line.” The temporo-parietal junction may play a special role in mediating these self-referenced functions in the different domains.

Highlights

  • Memory, motor-control, attention, learning, navigation, emotion, and perception are among the foundations of cognitive neurosciences

  • Experiments on mental number scaling in archaic cultures or children have revealed that humans represent numbers along a logarithmic scale, termed

  • Human experience numbers according to the resolution of perception: the perceived resolution decreases as numbers increase, yielding logarithmic scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Motor-control, attention, learning, navigation, emotion, and perception are among the foundations of cognitive neurosciences. Another vein of research, which pointed to cross-modalities, relates to “mental-lines.” Experiments on mental number scaling in archaic cultures or children have revealed that humans represent numbers along a logarithmic scale, termed “mental-number-line” (Dehaene and Cohen, 1995; Dehaene et al, 1999, 2008).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.