Abstract

Western engagement in fragile post-conflict states aims at building state institutions to protect both citizens and the surrounding world from non-state threats. The article claims that this policy fails to acknowledge the complexity on the ground. Localised non-state security solutions emerge in the absence of strong state structures and will often hold considerably more legitimacy than the formal state. If donors wish to promote human security, they must look beyond Hobbes and Weber and work with hybrid forms of state/non-state provision of security.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.