Abstract

Since 2006, a rural Georgia church has successfully produced and nationally distributed three feature length films. Each movie has shown higher production quality and box office profits than the last. The current research uses a perspective from Quentin Schultze to examine how this “tribal” medium is received by the larger mainstream press. In examining critics’ reviews, the investigation suggests that the films were viewed negatively, but that justifications for displeasure were not traditional aesthetic flaws. Instead, much of the focus was on the fact that the films were preachy and allowed limited polysemy. Such findings raise interesting questions about mainstream press acceptance of overtly religious media messages.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.