Abstract
In the United States, about 500,000 patients are receiving maintenance dialysis for end-stage renal disease. The decision to discontinue dialysis and receive hospice care tends to be more difficult than to withhold or forego dialysis. Supporting patient autonomy is an important health care priority that is recognized by most clinicians. However, some health care professionals are conflicted when patient autonomy varies from their treatment recommendations. This paper describes the case of a patient on kidney dialysis who chose to discontinue a potentially life-prolonging treatment. Respecting a patient's autonomy to make informed decisions about their end-of-life care is a fundamental ethical and legal principle. Medical opinion should not and cannot overrule the wishes of a competent patient who refuses treatment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
