When is tamponade not an echocardiographic diagnosis… Or is it ever?

Abstract

Although cardiac tamponade remains a clinical diagnosis, echocardiography is an essential tool todetect fluid in the pericardial space. Interpretation of echocardiographic findings and assessment of physiologic and hemodynamic consequences of a pericardial effusion require a thorough understanding of pathophysiologic processes. Certain echocardiographic signs point toward the presence of cardiac tamponade: a dilated inferior vena cava (IVC), collapse of the cardiac chambers, an inspiratory bulge of the interventricular septum into the left ventricle (LV) (the "septal bounce"), and characteristic respiratory variations of Doppler flow velocity recordings. However, in certain circumstances (e.g., mechanical ventilation, post-surgical patients, and pulmonary hypertension), these echocardiographic signs can be missing, despite the presence of clinical tamponade. Failure to recognize a potentially life-threatening clinical condition due to the absence of corresponding echocardiographic findings can delay both diagnosis and life-saving treatment. Thus, in the context of critical care, echocardiography should only be used to confirm the presence of pericardial fluid or localized hematoma, and the diagnosis of tamponade should rely on clinical criteria.