Abstract

AbstractProcesses of norm localisation play a crucial role in shaping the extent to which global governance norms are institutionalised at national and sub‐national levels. This article explores the politics of norm localisation through an empirical investigation of how global norms of “transparency” were localised in sub‐national processes of extractive industry governance in Bojonegoro, Indonesia. Previous theories of localisation have emphasised “constructivist” dynamics through which patterns of norm localisation are shaped decisively by efforts to build normative or cognitive congruence with local ideas and identities. In contrast, the mix of a newly democratised environment, the persistent power of corporatist elite networks and a populist style of local politics prevailing in Bojonegoro have diminished the significance of such constructivist dynamics as a basis for explaining varied patterns of norm localisation. Instead, patterns of norm localisation have depended crucially on the capacity of local political leaders to harness global governance norms instrumentally as a basis for consolidating and strengthening their own local power base. These findings have important implications for both theoretical and practical understandings of how global norm localisation processes vary in response to the contrasting political contexts in which global governance norms targeting the extractive sector are implemented.

Highlights

  • In recent decades, transparency has been widely promoted as a global governance norm, comprising a key ingredient of broader international agendas of “good governance” and corruption eradication directed towards resource-rich countries

  • Governance through the timely disclosure of government information and the enhancement of strong multi-stakeholder involvement in monitoring (Bourgouin & Haarstad, 2013, p. 91; Mejía Acosta, 2013, p. 591). As part of this broader trend, new international standards, such as the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI)1 and its progenitor, the global Publish What You Pay (PWYP) coalition, came to the fore of reform, seeking to impede rent-seeking behaviour and corruption through the disclosure of government revenue derived from extractive sectors (Corrigan, 2014; Hendrix, 2014)

  • The preceding sections showed that norm localisation relied crucially on local political leaders' ability to use global governance norms as a basis for consolidating and expanding their own local power base

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Transparency has been widely promoted as a global governance norm, comprising a key ingredient of broader international agendas of “good governance” and corruption eradication directed towards resource-rich countries (see Collier, 2007, p. 178; Stiglitz, 2007, p. 39). As part of this broader trend, new international standards, such as the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme (KPCS), the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative (EITI) and its progenitor, the global Publish What You Pay (PWYP) coalition, came to the fore of reform, seeking to impede rent-seeking behaviour and corruption through the disclosure of government revenue derived from extractive sectors (Corrigan, 2014; Hendrix, 2014). These schemes have made significant inroads, they have been widely contested, and implementation has been mixed. Existing studies have shown EITI implementation to depend on a range of factors including local institutional quality and configurations of power and interest between state, business and civil society organisations (Bourgouin & Haarstad, 2013; Gonzales-Espinosa & Klein, 2013; Vijge, Metcalfe, Wallbott, & Oberlack, 2019)

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call