Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that, when negative metastereotypes are made salient, members of low status groups help members of high status groups in order to improve the reputation of their low status group and its associated social identity. The present research investigated three potential moderators of low status groups’ outgroup helping: ingroup identification, audience group membership, and perceived reputational benefit. In Study 1 (N = 112) we found that members of a low status group (Keele University students) were most likely to offer to help raise funds for a high status group (University of Birmingham students) when they were high identifiers who had considered a negative metastereotype and believed that their responses would be viewed by an outgroup member. In Study 2 (N = 100) we found a similar effect in an intergroup context that referred to psychology students (low status ingroup) and junior doctors (high status outgroup), showing that the effect was limited to people who perceived reputational benefit in helping the outgroup. The practical and social implications of these findings are discussed in relation to intergroup contact and international relations.

Highlights

  • Previous research has demonstrated that, when negative metastereotypes are made salient, members of low status groups help members of high status groups in order to improve the reputation of their low status group and its associated social identity

  • The results showed that the mean percentage of metastereotypes that participants reported in the negative metastereotype condition (M = 81%, standard deviations (SD) = 23%) and the positive metastereotype condition (M = 70%, SD = 27%) were both significantly greater than 25%, which is the percentage that would be expected if only a single metastereotype was generated, tnegative = 17.95, p < .001; tpositive = 12.08, p

  • Consistent with predictions, members of a low status group (Keele University students) only offered to help to raise funds for a high status group (University of Birmingham students) when they were high identifiers who had considered a negative metastereotype and believed that their responses would be viewed by an outgroup member

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous research has demonstrated that, when negative metastereotypes are made salient, members of low status groups help members of high status groups in order to improve the reputation of their low status group and its associated social identity. People recognize that prosocial behavior is perceived as a socially desirable form of behavior by others, and they engage in public displays of helping because they want relevant others to witness their prosocial behavior and evaluate them positively as a result. This impression management motive is most likely the reason that anonymous donations are quite rare Members of low status groups may refrain from offering help to high status groups because they are aware that their behavior implies that the high status group is not as powerful as expected and that, their offer may be interpreted by the outgroup as a challenge to the legitimacy of the intergroup status hierarchy (Nadler, 2002; Nadler, Harpaz-Gorodeisky, & Ben-David, 2009)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call