Abstract
In the effort to contain the COVID-19 outbreak and mitigate its consequences, many hopes were placed on the use of AI-technology. Indeed, AI-based algorithms have informed decision-making in many aspects of the crisis, including diagnosis, infection tracking, outbreak forecasting, and allocation of essential resources and services. How do citizens view the incorporation of AI technology in making major public policy decisions? Using original survey data from the U.S. and Israel, I show that the public trusts humans significantly more than algorithms in making pandemic-related highstake decisions. However, experimental evidence indicates that this clear preference does not translate uniformly into lower support for policies that rely on algorithmic assessment. Rather, views on the use of algorithms differ substantially depending on the decision context in which it is deployed. The analysis indicates that while deployment of AI in public policy may be acceptable in some cases, it could trigger substantial opposition in other, theoretically-predictable contexts.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
