Abstract

Background: Critical ethnography studies power relationships in research settings through in-depth and sustained involvement in research contexts. It is a newly emerging methodological approach in engineering education and should be further explored and understood. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to present how critical ethnography has been used in research in engineering classrooms and to discuss what methodological insights we can gain from reviewing this research. Scope/Method: The purpose of the scoping review is to map key concepts and types of evidence related to the use of critical ethnography in engineering education research from 2005–2020. We assessed articles on their (1) ethnographic methodological design, (2) topics of empirical study, and (3) critical orientation. Conclusions: We found that authors defined ethnography broadly and that a majority of articles centered on student experience and learning in engineering. We also found that out of 35 articles included in the analysis, one study expressly used critical ethnography and 21 other studies employed some form of critical approach or construct. Our review has implications for researchers to expand the use of critical ethnography to understand complex engineering classroom arrangements and interactions.

Highlights

  • Engineering instructional contexts have fundamental challenges with equity and inclusion

  • In this article we present the results of a scoping review on critical ethnography in engineering education

  • We describe our findings, which focus on how ethnography and critical ethnography are used in engineering education

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Engineering instructional contexts have fundamental challenges with equity and inclusion. Original studies of curriculum and pedagogy in engineering were not typically grounded in social science methodology (Shuman et al, 2002; Streveler & Smith, 2006) and did not grapple with complex interaction and cultural dimensions of classrooms related to diversity, culture, and power dynamics. Relative to other qualitative methods that center interview or document analysis alone, ethnography has potential to provide rich insight into the interactions and culture that create engineering educational experiences Despite this potential, ethnography remains an emerging methodological approach in engineering education (Case & Light, 2011), and is worthy of further exploration and understanding. Critical ethnography studies power relationships in research settings through in-depth and sustained involvement in research contexts It is a newly emerging methodological approach in engineering education and should be further explored and understood. Our review has implications for researchers to expand the use of critical ethnography to understand complex engineering classroom arrangements and interactions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call