Abstract
This paper shows that regulations are automatic stabilizers for firms in the COVID-19 crisis. During the pandemic, more heavily regulated companies had stock and corporate bond returns that were four to five percent higher than less regulated firms. Prior to the crisis, highly regulated firms held more cash, had lower leverage, and were less likely to pay dividends, making them more resilient to extreme market conditions. More regulated firms also had lower systematic risk exposures during the crisis. Similar effects of regulations are found in the 2008 Financial Crisis. Furthermore, regulations on average do not lead to inferior stock returns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
