Abstract

Platform urbanism understood as the impact of digital platforms on the materiality, daily lives and governance of cities is, we argue in this paper, a powerful form of actually existing smart urbanism. While public attention tends to be grabbed by the control rooms and sensors of smart city narratives, the increasing density of interactions with, and transactions through, digital platforms rapidly and profoundly reshapes the dynamics of cities and their regulation. The paper investigates platform urbanism by focusing on the ‘Airbnb effect’ in the city of Reykjavik. Based on this case-study we argue that through their ubiquity and the control they have over code and data, platform companies increasingly tend to sit in cities’ control rooms. In its conclusion, the paper calls for more studies on three issues – ‘datapower’; platform effects on cities; and regulatory frames – to nurture a democratic debate on this ongoing corporatization of urban governance.

Highlights

  • At 2 PM my plane lands at Cape Town airport

  • We argue that platform urbanism is a form of “ existing smart urbanism” that reshapes the materiality, daily lives and governance of cities

  • We have shown how the use of digital platforms permeates the urban fabric and daily life, unobtrusively actualizing the advent of a data-driven city

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

At 2 PM my plane lands at Cape Town airport. A member of our research team has indicated where I will find the Uber pick-up point at the airport. Specific materialities are engendered by or related to digital platforms (Leszczynski, 2020): Airbnb condos, Uber cars, Deliveroo bikers or huge data centers (Caprotti and Liu, 2020) These materialities differ from the sensors and control rooms (Luque and Marvin, 2020) generally associated with smart urbanism. We investigate one instantiation of this existing smart urbanism by focusing on one type of digital platform, Airbnb, and its impacts on a specific city, the capital of Iceland, Reykjavík. The framing of digitally-mediated short-term rentals takes a specific form in Reykjavík: unlike Paris, Barcelona or Milan (Aguilera et al, 2019) where the impetus for regulation was initiated at the city level, in Iceland the national government first took the lead on the matter by voting the law implementing the 90 days quota. The difficulties of regulating platform urbanism in Reykjavík and elsewhere show that digital platforms, through their ubiquity and the control they have over code and data, produce a corporatisation of governance in which platform companies are increasingly in control

CONCLUSION
Findings
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call