Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles-collected (UAVs) digital red–green–blue (RGB) images provided a cost-effective method for precision agriculture applications regarding yield prediction. This study aims to fully explore the potential of UAV-collected RGB images in yield prediction of winter wheat by comparing it to multi-source observations, including thermal, structure, volumetric metrics, and ground-observed leaf area index (LAI) and chlorophyll content under the same level or across different levels of nitrogen fertilization. Color indices are vegetation indices calculated by the vegetation reflectance at visible bands (i.e., red, green, and blue) derived from RGB images. The results showed that some of the color indices collected at the jointing, flowering, and early maturity stages had high correlation (R2 = 0.76–0.93) with wheat grain yield. They gave the highest prediction power (R2 = 0.92–0.93) under four levels of nitrogen fertilization at the flowering stage. In contrast, the other measurements including canopy temperature, volumetric metrics, and ground-observed chlorophyll content showed lower correlation (R2 = 0.52–0.85) to grain yield. In addition, thermal information as well as volumetric metrics generally had little contribution to the improvement of grain yield prediction when combining them with color indices derived from digital images. Especially, LAI had inferior performance to color indices in grain yield prediction within the same level of nitrogen fertilization at the flowering stage (R2 = 0.00–0.40 and R2 = 0.55–0.68), and color indices provided slightly better prediction of yield than LAI at the flowering stage (R2 = 0.93, RMSE = 32.18 g/m2 and R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 39.82 g/m2) under all levels of nitrogen fertilization. This study highlights the capabilities of color indices in wheat yield prediction across genotypes, which also indicates the potential of precision agriculture application using many other flexible, affordable, and easy-to-handle devices such as mobile phones and near surface digital cameras in the future.

Highlights

  • Fernandez-Gallego et al (2019) [29] evaluate different color indices to predict durum wheat yield under different water regime conditions, and the results showed that color indices gave comparable performance with NDVI in durum wheat yield prediction

  • The results showed that the Unmanned aerial vehicles-collected (UAVs)-acquired temperature measurement was reliable

  • Including the blue band in the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) aimed at reducing noise and uncertainties associated with highly variable atmospheric aerosols, rather than providing additional biophysical information on vegetation properties [47]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The promising trend of precision agriculture distinguishes itself from traditional agriculture by its advanced equipment and technologies to collect and analyze the field information to optimize the use of fertilizers, water, herbicides, and pesticides and improve crop production and quality. The International Society of Precision Agriculture (https://www.ispag.org/, accessed on 10 July 2021) defined precision agriculture in 2019 as a management strategy that gathers, processes, and analyzes temporal, spatial, and Remote Sens. Traditional yield prediction relied on ground-based field surveys, which are costly, subjective, and not applicable to large-scale prediction [3,5]; on the contrary, remote sensing technology show great potential in timely and non-destructive yield prediction at local to regional scales [1,4,6,7,8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call