What's the basis for treating infections your way? Quality assessment of review articles on the treatment of urinary and respiratory tract infections in older people.

Abstract

To assess the quality of readily available review articles on urinary and respiratory tract infections in older people. Data sources were articles identified by MEDLINE search (1988-1998), review of the bibliographies of identified publications, textbooks from the library of a geriatric university hospital, and booklets with general guidelines on antibiotic therapy. Selection was made of review articles or book chapters about urinary and/or respiratory tract infections in older people that were readily available, ie, in Swiss medical libraries. Quality was assessed according to clinical applicability of the recommendations, methodology of the review, type of literature cited in the bibliography, and age of the population included in these reference articles. Only 13 of 29 (45%) review articles about urinary tract infections and seven of 29 (24%) articles about respiratory tract infections satisfied our criteria of applicability. Specifically, dosage, route of administration, and treatment duration were often not described. The overall methodological quality was low (mean score 1.9 +/- 1.0 on a scale of 9). No review specified the methods used to identify, select, and validate included information. Authors of the review articles quoted an important number of other review articles and only a small number of clinical trials. Less than one-quarter of these clinical trials actually comprised primarily an older population. Review articles on treatment of common infectious diseases in older people are often neither clinically applicable nor of good methodological quality. Therefore, more systematic review articles regarding treatment of older patients, as well as evidence-based practice guidelines, are needed.