Abstract
This Article examines design patent law in the context of the 2019 Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decision of Curver Luxembourg, SARL v. Home Expressions, Inc. It first explains the law of design patents as it was prior to the Curver Luxembourg decision — providing an overview of the three key requirements for design patent eligibility, the concept of an article of manufacture, and the design patent prosecution process. Then, it examines the Curver Luxembourg decision itself: the background of the case, the district court decision, and its affirmation on appeal. Finally, it examines the decision’s implications for design patent law, industry reactions to the decision, and specifically considers the increased importance of patent titles and the decision’s impact on the scope of prior art.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
