What’s happening? The expanding role of apheresis platelet support in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: Current status and future trends

Abstract

Despite some unresolved problems that may be associated with platelet transfusion, such as alloimmunisation, refractoriness, bacterial contamination, and the potential side effects related to the development of some biological response modifiers during storage, platelet therapy remains the most effective treatment for the management and prevention of severe thrombocytopenia and hemorrhage [Seghatchian J, Snyder EL, Krailadsiri P, editors. Platelet therapy: current status and future trends. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2000]. This appears to be particularly the case in neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT), which arises due to an incompatibility of the platelet specific antigens between the pregnant mother and her baby. Over 80% of severe NAIT cases in the Caucasian population occur when the mother and baby differ in their HPA-1 epitope (HPA-1a negative and positive respectively) leading, in 10% of cases, to the production of anti-HPA-1a which can cross the placenta and cause NAIT in utero or post-partum. Anti-HPA-5b is the second most cause of NAIT, although severe cases occur only after the first pregnancy. Clinical manifestations of NAIT vary from mild (petechia and bruises) to severe (intracranial haemorrhage with possible death or life long morbidity). A recent study in Scotland indicated that the cost per case of severe NAIT detected during screening of pregnant women, where anti-HPA-1a is detected for the first time, would amount to $98,771 [Turner M, Bessos H, et al. Prospective epidemiological study of the outcome and cost effectiveness of antenatal screening to detect neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (NAIT) due to anti-HPA-1a. Transfusion, in press. [2]]. Yet, unlike the case with Rhesus hemolytic disease of the new born, the cost-effectiveness of HPA-1 screening in NAIT remains unresolved, as does the most optimal mode of treatment. Therefore, in the absence of a consensus on the screening and optimal management of NAIT, the availability and provision of HPA-1a/5b negative apheresis platelets based on current practice (transfusionguidelines.org.uk) appear to be a clinically effective treatment in NAIT. In that vein, an increasing number of blood transfusion centres are screening blood donors in order to secure panels of donors for the prompt provision of HPA-1a/5b negative apheresis platelets. However, evidence is also accumulating that while platelets derived from various apheresis technologies currently in use may be equivalent in terms of cellular contents (thus meeting specifications), they may differ in terms of the platelet storage lesion, microvesiculation and the development of platelet-derived cytokines and some other biological response modifiers [Seghatchian J. Platelet storage lesion: the influence of various leukoreduction procedures on generation/retention of some biological response modifiers, microvesiculation, distribution of membrane-bound/soluble Prion and the rate of HLA-CLASS1 release. Trans Apher Sci, in press. [3]]. This manuscript summarises strategy and progress both in the improvement of apheresis platelet quality and provision in NAIT.