Abstract
Both sertraline (SER) and prolonged exposure (PE) are empirically supported treatments for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While efficacious, these treatments are quite different in approach, and such differences may influence both treatment choice and treatment outcome. To date, we know very little about the relative efficacy of pharmacological and psychological treatments for chronic PTSD. In Study 1, we compared rates of treatment choice (SER or PE) in 74 trauma-exposed women. In Study 2, we extended this work to an open-choice treatment trial, in which 31 female assault survivors with chronic PTSD received their choice of SER or PE for ten weeks and were followed over time. In Study 1 (82%) and Study 2 (74.2%), the majority of women chose PE. In Study 2, both SER and PE evidenced moderate to large unadjusted effect sizes, with evidence of an advantage for PE in propensity adjusted analyses at posttreatment. Women with co-occurring major depressive disorder (MDD) were more likely to choose SER than those without MDD. However, among those with MDD, the advantage of PE was particularly evident. Our results highlight the presence of clear treatment preferences for PTSD and their potential impact on outcome. This study underscores the importance of systematic study of patient preferences and encourages a rethinking of one-size fits all approaches to treatment for mental disorders.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.