Abstract
In their critique of N. S. Raju, M. J. Burke, and J. Normand's (1990) utility model, M. K. Judiesch, F. L. Schmidt, and J. E. Hunter (1993) claimed that Raju et al. simply shifted the problem from one of estimating the standard deviation of the dollar-valued performance (Y) to that of estimating the coefficient of variation (σ Y /μ Y ). In showing the inaccuracy of this claim, the authors demonstrate that Judiesch et al.'s misunderstandings of the underlying assumptions of Raju et al.'s model have led to their misinterpretations. Furthermore, the authors refute Judiesch et al.'s contentions that (a) the A parameter in Raju et al.'s model is equal to average employee value and (b) it is appropriate to correct the validity coefficient for criterion unreliability when conducting a utility analysis
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
