Abstract
Textbook wisdom would suggest that the Congress and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are taking an appropriate approach to policies regarding environmental risks associated with animal agriculture in the United States. Relevant federal environmental regulations are based on performance standards, which are preferred on economic efficiency grounds over technology-based regulation (Baumol and Oates). Furthermore, the states are given the opportunity to implement these standards-based federal regulations, a feature that allows for policy customization in accordance with unique environmental attributes of each state. Pressure from environmental regulation, in combination with the increased mobility of large vertically integrated livestock production units (Abdalla, Lanyon, and Hallberg) should, in theory, act to optimally allocate concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in areas of the country that have low environmental vulnerability to the byproducts of animal agriculture, and, thus, have lower costs of compliance. Smaller and land-extensive livestock operations that are not so readily mobile would remain in locations where, because of lower and different environmental risk
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.