What Types of Data are Pharmacy Education Scholars Using in Their Abstracts for Poster Presentations?

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to describe the data being used to support poster presentations in pharmacy education scholarship. MethodsResearch and education posters presented at the 2020 American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Annual Meeting were unitized to isolate text to be coded, and 2 coders categorized the quantitative and qualitative data by type and source. Questionnaires, instruments, and exams were categorized as new (ie, developed and used for this particular inquiry) versus existing. Qualitative data types were categorized as interviews, focus groups, self-reflections, analysis of student work products (eg, lab reports assessed for student understanding), comments (ie, written or verbal comments), and other (eg, course reports). ResultsA total of 216 abstracts were included in the analysis, with 80 (37%) abstracts relying on data derived from respondent’s perceptions. Further, 143 abstracts (66%) used at least 1 new questionnaire, instrument, or exam. In 57% of the cases where multiple data sources were used, the study involved interprofessional education (eg, multiple health professions learners) or pharmacy student-investigator combinations, and 28 abstracts (13%) did not use pharmacy students as a source. Less than 5% of all abstracts analyzed used traditional qualitative methods of interviews and focus groups. ConclusionThis study can open conversations around how to improve the quality of pharmacy education research and the identification of areas within the scholarship of teaching and learning that may benefit from improvement.