Abstract

The first question dealt with in the paper is whether it’s worth worrying about unequal income distribution. The supposed long run constant factor shares, the positive effects of inequality and the greater importance of absolute level of income compared to its unequal distribution seems to deny this need. On the contrary, economic, social and fairness reasons support the need to care about unequal income distribution. Therefore, measures should be taken about income inequality, and a distinction has to be made between measures to prevent excessive inequality from happening and measures to redistribute income once inequality has taken place. In order to envisage appropriate measures it is necessary to find out what causes the growing trend of increasing inequality in income distribution: economic and institutional factors are taken into consideration. Consequently a range of measures are suggested, which go from reducing the “degree of monopoly” in the economy to regulating the financial system, from improving the system of collective bargaining to curbing the “predatory behaviour” of the executives. Redistribution measures are also discussed, with a warning about the risk of causing with them more harm than the inequality they are supposed to counteract.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.