Abstract
The lack of a clear definition of radicalism leads Islamic organisations to feel entitled to interpret it. It results in contention for the meaning of radicalism and forms a different reality for each reader. By taking a case study on two spectra of Islamic organisations, moderate Islamic organisation (NU Online) and Islamic extremist organisation (Portal Islam), this study aims to understand the construction of radicalism in two Islamic news portals. We utilised a dataset of news about radicalism from September 2018-2019 and analysed it using a combination of corpus linguistic (CL) and critical discourse analysis (CDA). While CL helped to reveal emerging discourses, CDA intended to observe the patterns and relate them into socio-political contexts critically. The results indicate that each site was blurring the information function of news portals into a propaganda function. They also generate fragmented knowledge, which leads to a misrepresentation of paradigm towards radicalism. This leads to discriminatory actions against other groups. The meaning of radicalism in the media may encourage group dichotomy, which is counterproductive to countering terrorism in Indonesia. This study contributes to a comprehension of the terrorism phenomenon by providing a closer view of how moderate and extreme Islamic organisations interpret radicalism.
Highlights
Terrorism is an objective reality that can be interpreted subjectively (Karaffa, 2012, 2015)
This study is intended to understand the construction of radicalism by two spectra of Islamic organisations
We found that as the media massively preach about Islam as a religion linked to radicalism and terrorism, these two sites, in their respective ways, try to dismiss the issue by presenting an image of moderate Islam on NU Online and clarifying that radicalism is a political spin on the Portal Islam
Summary
Terrorism is an objective reality that can be interpreted subjectively (Karaffa, 2012, 2015). Terrorism is considered an act rooted in radical Islam (Neumann et al, 2018) It creates stereotypes in radical Islamic movements, which result in discrimination against groups with a strong Islamic identity who are suspected of being terrorists, extremists, or whole groups (Mubarok & Hamid, 2018; Umar, 2010). This legalises certain groups of people or even a state to commit acts of discrimination and violence against radical groups (Karaffa, 2012; Schmid, 2013).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
