Abstract

The chemical stimuli of special significance to taste are sugars (sweet), amino acids (umami), sodium chloride and other salts (salty), alkaloids (bitter) and acids (sour). Sugars and amino acids tend to be preferred, while alkaloids and acids tend to be avoided. Intake of salts depends on electrolyte balance. The gustatory system codes taste qualities and their associated hedonic attributes. The ability to distinguish foods from poisons is so important that it is hard-wired in the receptor cells themselves. Yet despite teleological appeal, neither nutritional value nor toxicity is a stimulus dimension that is coded per se. Sweet and bitter may be considered metaphors for nutritious and toxic, respectively. Toxicity and nutrition are not chemical properties of a stimulus nor are they properties of the senses. They are defined in terms of critical metabolic events, most of which are beyond sensation. For example, sucrose and saccharin are both sweet, but saccharin has no caloric value. Salts such as NaCl and LiCl have similar tastes, yet lithium salts are toxic but sodium salts are not. There are many examples of neurotoxins that are tasteless yet extremely toxic. Strychnine and sucrose octaacetate (SOA) are both bitter, though strychnine is toxic while SOA is not.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.