Abstract

This study investigated how sentence formulation is influenced by a preceding discourse context. In two eye-tracking experiments, participants described pictures of two-character transitive events in Dutch (Experiment 1) and Chinese (Experiment 2). Focus was manipulated by presenting questions before each picture. In the Neutral condition, participants first heard “What is happening here?” In the Object or Subject Focus conditions, the questions asked about the Object or Subject character (What is the policeman stopping? Who is stopping the truck?). The target response was the same in all conditions (The policeman is stopping the truck). In both experiments, sentence formulation in the Neutral condition showed the expected pattern of speakers fixating the subject character (policeman) before the object character (truck). In contrast, in the focus conditions speakers rapidly directed their gaze preferentially only to the character they needed to encode to answer the question (the new, or focused, character). The timing of gaze shifts to the new character varied by language group (Dutch vs. Chinese): shifts to the new character occurred earlier when information in the question can be repeated in the response with the same syntactic structure (in Chinese but not in Dutch). The results show that discourse affects the timecourse of linguistic formulation in simple sentences and that these effects can be modulated by language-specific linguistic structures such as parallels in the syntax of questions and declarative sentences.

Highlights

  • To produce a sentence, speakers must prepare a preverbal message and encode it linguistically

  • Sentence formulation in the Subject Focus and Object Focus conditions was strongly influenced by the preceding discourse context

  • Speech onsets were longer in the Neutral condition than in the Object and Subject Focus conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Speakers must prepare a preverbal message and encode it linguistically. These processes are assumed to proceed incrementally (e.g., Kempen and Hoenkamp, 1987). We consider formulation of simple event descriptions like The policeman is stopping the truck (Figure 1) in response to informational wh-questions. Questions like “What is the policeman stopping?” provide a discourse context that establishes one referent in the event as contextually old information and the referent that is being asked about as new, and focused, information (Gussenhoven, 2007). In answer to this question, the typical answer (The policeman is stopping the truck) includes policemen as given information and truck as new (focused) information. If the question is Who is stopping the truck?, the typical answer (The policeman is stopping the truck) includes policeman as the focused referent, indicating that it is the policeman, rather than a person of another profession, who is stopping the truck

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call