Abstract
Heterodox economists have ‘always’ criticized mainstream economic textbooks, but what about criticisms put forward by mainstream economists? A limited but lively and rather overlooked mainstream debate is identified in this essay, in which the general message is that there is a critical gap between textbooks and the real world. The criticisms aired in this debate almost seem to be forgotten, although most of them are still highly relevant and, if taken seriously, might lead to significant changes of economics textbooks.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
