Abstract
ABSTRACTFor its panel survey of professional macroeconomic forecasters, the US Federal Reserve asks panelists whether they use the ‘natural rate of unemployment’ (NRU) or ‘non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment’ (NAIRU) in formulating their forecasts and, also, to estimate the NRU/NAIRU. This paper studies responses and non-responses to those questions in order to interrogate forecasters’ views of the NRU/NAIRU. We find that most panelists in most years say they do not use the NRU/NAIRU, and they do not provide an estimate of it. Among those who do, their NRU/NAIRU estimates differ but usually do not differ significantly from the average of recent unemployment rates. We fail to find much evidence – in either their inflation and unemployment forecasts, NRU/NAIRU estimates, or revisions to those estimates over time – that panelists who use the NRU/NAIRU treat it as an unemployment rate below which inflation rises and above which inflation falls. Finally, we find that the NRU/NAIRU has no informational value for panelists who say they use it; they are no better at accurately forecasting inflation or unemployment.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.