Abstract
It will be argued in this paper that there is no good reason to limit the offensive effect of equitable estoppel to its proprietary form, which is narrowly focused on property rights in land. This paper elucidates the differences between promissory and proprietary estoppel, and ask if the differences in the elements of each doctrine can explain why only proprietary estoppel enjoys offensive effect.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
