Abstract
compared the merits of two models of intertheoric reduction: the Causal Mechanical (CM) model and the General Reduction Replacement (GRR) model. The GRR model, a modified version of Nagel's model of intertheoric reduction,1 was seen as the "appropriate framework in terms of which deeper logical questions", like the establishment of synthetic identities, "could be pursued" (1993, p 498); while the CM model, according to Schaffner, could "not be the whole story" by any means because it was occluding "important deep structural issues such as specific points at which iden
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
