Abstract
Village committees, as grassroots spontaneously formed by rural collective members in China’s hierarchy system, play an irreplaceable role in the management of rural public affairs. Based on the filed survey dataset taken from three pilot counties/districts in Sichuan province, we explored the significant role that village committees played in farmers’ withdrawal from rural homesteads (WRH). Our empirical results, according to binary logistic regression (BLR) modelling, indicated that the WRH was significantly affected by the triple roles of village committees, among which information intermediary was the most effective followed by the trust builder and then the coordinated manager. Firstly, village committees’ involvement facilitated the WRH by improving policy transparency and decreasing information cost. Secondly, the depth of village committees’ participation (i.e., being involved in multiple phases) positively affected the WRH given its signification of the participation of farmers. Whereas the breadth of participation (i.e., considering various demands of different participants) negatively affected the process of WRH by reducing the decision-making efficiency. Thirdly, farmers’ trust in institutions played a positive role in the WRH, but their confidence in village cadres had limited impact. We therefore argue that promising village committees should act as “all-round stewards” in the decision-making of rural households, which not only includes the transmit of information between those above and those below, but also needs to actively strive for farmers’ trust by letting their voice heard. Based on our empirical findings, this paper finally proposed some policy suggestions, such as strengthening mutual communication, empowerment of rural grassroots, encouraging farmers’ participation and improving formal institutions.
Highlights
The depopulation of rural areas is observed across the globe [1,2,3]
Based on the field survey data in three pilot counties/districts of Sichuan province, China, we in this study analyzed the triple roles of village committees and investigated their impacts on the withdrawal from rural homesteads (WRH)
The results indicate that village committees’ participation significantly affected farmers’ willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads
Summary
The depopulation of rural areas (excluding exurbs along the urban–rural continuum) is observed across the globe [1,2,3]. Land 2020, 9, 477 the registered population declining, which is recognized as the ‘paradox of development’ or ‘dilemma of governance’ [7,8,9,10] This phenomenon has inevitably led to a far-reaching restructuring of physical and human landscapes in rural China and the inefficiency of land use and ‘village hollowing’ as well [11,12,13,14]. WRH refers to the transfer of homestead use right to collective economic organizations under. WRH refers to the transfer of homestead use right to collective economic organizations under farmers’ voluntary application with compensation from the government. Farmers can either live in concentrated settlements nearby or directly migrate to cities. House-losing can either live in concentrated settlements nearby or directly migrate to cities. In China, WRH is mostly dominated by local governments at the county/township-levels
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
