Abstract

Since the mid-1980s, critics of identity politics have argued that progressive social movements organized on the basis of shared biological or social traits—such as race, gender, class, and sexual orientation—may succeed in achieving recognition and legitimacy for their particular groups, but probably will not effect broad, systemic changes. Many of these critics suggest that people need to work together, across traditional identity lines, to solve the problems brought about by today's global economy. These include the growing gap between the rich and the poor and the creation of a two-tiered labor market in which many white- and blue-collar employees have been re-classified as temporary, contract workers. Since the 1990s, a similar argument has been made by other scholars and activists about the need for new coalitions to solve problems related to climate change, which they suggest will be mitigated only if we bring together unusual bedfellows, such as environmentalists and community-based social justice organizations.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.