Abstract
Lithuanian researchers rarely use Grounded theory (GT) for research in psychology as it poses specific/unique challenges for a researcher and requires additional knowledge. This article covers problematic questions that are important before starting research using GT method.GT is a systematic methodology in the social sciences that attempts to generate theory out of data through a special process of conducting research. GT is a research method that use almost a reverse fashion from traditional positivistic research and at first may appear contradictory to the scientific method used in traditional psychological research. Rather than beginning with literature analyses and developing a hypothesis, the first step is data collection through a variety of methods where data collection and analysis proceeds simultaneously. Article covers how psychology could benefit from using GT as research methodology, especially in fields where studies are just starting and there are no clear findings. GT is especially valuable for the possibility to focus on process research and use and combine a wide variety of data. Article reveals difficulty to talk about GT as a united method because there was a split in usage of GT methodology between authors B. Glaser and A. L. Strauss. Disagreement especially intensified after the K. Charmaz presented her own version of GT. Scientists do not agree about homogeneity of GT and raise questions about different versions and amount of GT versions. It is still unclear how many common elements exist in these versions and what could be named as GT core. The idea about choosing the particular version of GT for research is becoming more prominent than ever. Article follows recommendations of W. A. Babchuk (2009 a) and M. Weed (2009) for choosing one particular GT version, and criticize vague and eclectic use of GT methods. The aim of GT is to generate the “middle range“ theory, and this theory construction purpose raises many questions about validity and adequacy of such idea which is analyzed in article. Various attitudes about theory for different GT versions emerge. Especially clear classical GT (Glaser) position that only this version of method gives adequate conceptual level to generate independent middle rage theory. Literature analyses, hypothesis testing and use of different kind of data are discussed and clarified different position of GT versions in this article. Glaser is famous for his affirmation that only classical GT is real GT and one that can be called a general research methodology. Other versions of GT are regarded by him only as sharing the same vocabulary but using only qualitative inductive method for research. GT uses special vocabulary for procedures that is difficult to translate into Lithuanian without affecting the meaning and requires deep understanding of every word for grasping the meaning of GT process and operating these concepts while doing research. This article is one of the first attempts to translate and use Lithuanian terms of GT in the field of psychological research.
Highlights
The aim of Grounded theory (GT) is to generate the “middle range“ theory, and this theory construction purpose raises many questions about validity and adequacy of such idea which is analyzed in article
This article covers problematic questions which are important before starting research using GT method
GT is a systematic methodology in the social sciences
Summary
KĄ TURĖTŲ ŽINOTI PSICHOLOGAS PRIEŠ NAUDODAMAS GRINDŽIAMĄJĄ TEORIJĄ* SAVO TYRIMUOSE. Grindžiamoji teorija (toliau – GT) – dar mažai taikomas metodas psichologijos moksle Lietuvoje. Kad tai buvo bandymas užlopyti tarp empirinių tyrimų ir mokslinės teorijos susidarančią spragą (Glaser and Strauss, 1967). Daugelio psichologams skirtų vadovėlių apie kokybinius tyrimo metodus (Henwood and Pidgeon, 2003; Chamberlain et al, 2004; Rennie, 2006) įvadiniuose tekstuose akcentuojama, kad yra keletas skirtingų GT versijų, tačiau pateikiamos panašios procedūros, kaip atlikti tyrimą ir kurti savarankiškas teorijas. Todėl tarp profesionalių GT tyrėjų ima vyrauti nuomonė (Charmaz, 2001; Babchuk, 2009a; Byrant, 2009; Weed, 2009, 2010), jog tyrėjas turi būti išsamiai susipažinęs su pagrindinėmis GT versijomis tam, kad iš esmės suprastų, kaip veikia GT metodas, prie jo prisitaikytų, pasirinktų jo versiją (ir jos laikytųsi atlikdamas tyrimą) ar tik paskui imtų „kurti“ savąją. GT yra metodas, skirtas kurti teoriją (Glaser and Strauss, 1967), ir jos galutinis rezultatas – nauja, savarankiška teorija. Tinkama GT visada turi potencialą toliau plėtotis (Glaser, 1978, 1998)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.