Abstract

BackgroundExisting research provides estimates of the biophysical potential for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, however additional research is needed to enhance our understanding of the economic potential for agricultural soils to offset or help reduce CO2 emissions. This study derives the marginal cost to increase SOC sequestration by combining SOC sequestration potential estimates developed using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) factors with an existing payment scheme that was designed to increase no-till (NT) adoption on U.S. cropland. The marginal costs of increasing SOC is a function of the amount of SOC that could be increased through NT and the expected cost to landowners of changing management to use NT.ResultsThe variability in SOC sequestration rates due to different land-use, management histories, climate, and soils, combined with the 48 unique payment rates to adopt NT, yield over 5,000 unique marginal cost values for increasing SOC sequestration. Nearly 95 percent of the biophysical potential SOC sequestration increase on U.S. cropland (2802 Tg CO2 from 140.1 Tg CO2 year−1 for 20 years) could be captured for less than $100 Mg−1 CO2. An estimated 64 to 93 percent of the biophysical potential could be captured for less than the low and high estimated costs to capture CO2 for geologic storage of $36.36 to $86.06 Mg−1 CO2, respectively.ConclusionsDecreasing tillage intensity through adoption of no-till agriculture offers a cost-effective way to offset a portion of increasing global CO2 emissions. This research demonstrates that increasing SOC stocks through NT adoption can offset CO2 emissions at a lower cost than some other options for preventing CO2 from entering the atmosphere.

Highlights

  • Existing research provides estimates of the biophysical potential for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, additional research is needed to enhance our understanding of the economic potential for agricultural soils to offset or help reduce ­CO2 emissions

  • Based upon the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) factors to account for climate, soil characteristics, soil disturbance through tillage, biomass input, and National Resources Inventory (NRI) crop data, total SOC stocks increased by NT adoption on U.S cropland in 2017 was estimated to be 38.2 Tg C ­year−1 (140.1 Tg ­CO2 ­year−1), a rate that could be maintained for 20 years based on the IPCC assumed time to carbon stock equilibrium (Table 1; IPCC [21])

  • The smallest SOC sequestration rate resulted from final transitions from reduced tillage (RT) to NT when cropland was Conventional tillage (CT) or non-crop in the initial period

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Existing research provides estimates of the biophysical potential for increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, additional research is needed to enhance our understanding of the economic potential for agricultural soils to offset or help reduce ­CO2 emissions. This study derives the marginal cost to increase SOC sequestration by combining SOC sequestration potential estimates developed using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) factors with an existing payment scheme that was designed to increase no-till (NT) adoption on U.S cropland. Increasing soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks helps to reduce or offset ­CO2 emissions and helps to decrease the ­CO2 emissions that increase the atmospheric concentration levels of C­ O2. The SOC stock on cropland may be increased through decreased soil disturbance from tillage, removal of highly erodible land from crop production, reduced bare summer fallow, and inclusion of winter cover crops

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.