Abstract

We study how OSS project owners can manage their repositories so as to motivate particularly high-skilled coders to exert continuous effort after joining a project. Drawing on literature from personnel economics, we lay out how coders’ skill level affects their selection for a focal project in the first place. In turn, we theorize how project-specific norms and quality aspirations that developers learn about after joining an OSS project represent treatments that varyingly entice developers to contribute more code conditional on their skill level. Based on a custom-tailored dataset merging GitHub and Stack Overflow data for almost 50,000 contributor-project-month observations, we find that repository owners are able to motivate their most talented volunteer contributors when they (1) show no visible commercial orientation while managing their projects, (2) show generosity in accepting external contributions, and (3) provide fast feedback. We discuss implications for research and practice in the fields of community-based organizations like OSS as well as personnel economics.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.