Abstract

Future vehicles may drive automatically in a human-like manner or contain systems that monitor human driving ability. Algorithms of these systems must have knowledge of criteria of good and safe driving behavior with regard to different driving styles. In the current study, interviews were conducted with 30 drivers, including driving instructors, engineers, and race drivers. The participants were asked to describe good driving on public roads and race tracks, and in some questions were supported with video material. The results were interpreted with the help of Endsley’s model of situation awareness. The interviews showed that there were clear differences between what was considered good driving on the race track and good driving on the public road, where for the former, the driver must touch the limit of the vehicle, whereas, for the latter, the limit should be avoided. However, in both cases, a good driver was characterized by self-confidence, lack of stress, and not being aggressive. Furthermore, it was mentioned that the driver’s posture and viewing behavior are essential components of good driving, which affect the driver’s prediction of events and execution of maneuvers. The implications of our findings for the development of automation technology are discussed. In particular, we see potential in driver posture estimation and argue that automated vehicles excel in perception but may have difficulty making predictions.

Highlights

  • More and more automation systems are being developed that take over specific subtasks from the driver

  • Four race drivers indicated that they offer racing instruction sessions

  • The quotes were grouped according to a model comprising a combination of Endsley’s (1995, 2000) model of situation awareness and the driving hierarchy initially proposed by Donges (1982)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More and more automation systems are being developed that take over specific subtasks from the driver. Examples include adaptive cruise control that can approach curves like a human driver does (Zhang, Xiao, Wang, & Li, 2013), automated lane changing that imitates lane changing by a human (Do et al, 2017), and automation that appears to have ‘‘mastered the more human-like driving skill of crawling forward at a stop sign to signal its intent” (Niedermeyer, 2019). The level of automation will increase in the future. This implies new challenges, where the automated car may have to exhibit safe human-like behavior in a variety of road and traffic conditions. A model by Kolekar, De Winter, and Abbink (2020) operationalized Gibson and Crooks’s (1938) field of safe travel and can display human-like behavior, including driving with an appro-

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.