Abstract

2013 Background: Optimal management of PCNSL is not defined. To date the best outcomes have been achieved by combined modality therapy using methotrexate (MTX)-based chemotherapy and WBRT. However, WBRT carries a significant risk of neurotoxicity and may not be required in all patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 122 patients who had complete response (CR) after initial chemotherapy, from a total of 338 PCNSL patients treated in our institution since 1986. Descriptive variables including sex, age, KPS at diagnosis, histology, and extent of CNS involvement were reported. We specifically studied the benefit of consolidation therapy with WBRT and/or high dose Ara-C on OS and PFS. Results: The median age was 60 (19–89) years and a median KPS was 70. Men constituted 57% of the patients. Median follow up was 30 months. Histologically, 83% had diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Ocular and CSF involvements were 13%, and 27%, respectively. Most patients received MTX-based regimens (96%). Five-year OS was 43% and five-year PFS was 50% for all patients. There was no significant difference in OS, between patients who received consolidation therapy with Ara-C (n=35), WBRT (n=12), Ara-C + WBRT (n=28), or no consolidation (n=42) [data from 5 patients are missing]. There was a trend towards improved disease control for patients treated with WBRT; however, these patients were also younger than the other groups. Risk of neurotoxicity was significantly higher in patients who received WBRT (p=0.005). Conclusions: Consolidation therapy does not clearly improve survival in PCNSL patients with a CR to initial treatment. However other important prognostic factors including age and KPS may have been used in the decision making related to consolidation therapy. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call