Abstract
While previous studies have recognized the importance of resource tax in environmental governance, we know relatively little about whether resource tax can get a win-win both in corporate financial performance (CFP) and corporate environmental performance (CEP). Using China's resource tax reform (RTR) policy in 2016 as a quasi-natural experiment and adopting a difference-in-differences (DID) strategy, we estimate the real effect of resource tax on CFP and CEP. The results show that RTR increases the financial performance of the regulated firms by 32.26% and the environmental performance by 46.15% compared to the non-regulated firms, indicating that resource tax can promote firms' sustainable development. Mechanism analysis shows that the effect of resource tax is mainly driven by firms' technological innovation and productivity improvement. Moreover, we further find that RTR performs better for firms with weaker tax burden-shifting ability and firms located in areas with poorer resource endowments. Overall, our study not only provides evidence for the Porter hypothesis from the perspective of resource tax, but also offers important policy implications for developing countries in their pursuit of sustainable economic and environmental development.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Environmental science and pollution research international
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.