Abstract
While psychotherapy has many applications for mood disorders, this paper focuses on those psychotherapies (cognitive behaviour therapy or CBT, and interpersonal psychotherapy or IPT) that have been manualized, extensively evaluated, and positioned as definitive therapies for unipolar depressive disorders. This paper suggests some reasons as to why their role and utility remain unclear. First, despite many randomized controlled efficacy studies, differentiation from other psychotherapies or control interventions appears to occur only when the actual control treatment possesses few therapeutic ingredients. Second, their testing as if they have universal application for non-specific diagnostic entities (e.g. major depression), in trials where there is a high rate of non-specific responsivity to intervention, has limited our capacity to identify the circumstances in which such treatments have specific benefits. Thus, many of the limitations to the knowledge base more reflect limitations reflecting the current evaluation of all antidepressant therapies rather than being unique to the psychotherapies. This paper argues for a change in the paradigms for evaluating the psychotherapies, and argues for a 'horses for courses' approach for conceptualizing the roles of the psychotherapies in managing mood disorders, rather than any model assuming their universal application.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.