Abstract
ObjectiveDifferent endometrial preparation protocols are used prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). It is not clear whether letrozole-stimulated cycles are beneficial for anovulatory women compared to artificial cycles (AC) in anovulatory women. Our objective was to investigate whether clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer in letrozole-stimulated cycles differ from artificial cycles in anovulatory women.Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in a public fertility center in China comparing letrozole-stimulated and artificial cycles during FET. A total of 5,322 anovulatory women undergoing the first cycle of FET between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy. ResultsThe live birth rates were significantly higher in the letrozole compared with AC (49.57 % vs. 45.22 %) both in the crude (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.40) and adjusted analysis (aOR 1.27, 95 %CI 1.08–1.50). After controlling for potential covariates, the adjusted probability of biochemical pregnancy (65.71 % vs. 63.25 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.01–1.43), clinical pregnancy (61.53 % vs. 58.79 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.02–1.43), and ongoing pregnancy (50.14 % vs. 45.66 %, aOR 1.28, 95 %CI: 1.08–1.51) were higher among those using letrozole-stimulated cycles than among those undergoing artificial cycles. The miscarriage rate was lower following letrozole compared with artificial cycles (aOR 0.59, 95 %CI: 0.43–0.80). The ectopic pregnancy in the letrozole group was similar to that in the artificial cycles. ConclusionsLetrozole-stimulated FET was significantly associated with higher rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth, and with a lower rate of miscarriage, compared with artificial cycles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.