Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked muscle wasting disease. The disease is due to mutations in the DMD gene that encodes for a large intracellular protein called dystrophin. Dystrophin plays a critical role in linking the internal cytoskeleton of the striated muscle cell with the extracellular matrix as well as having cell signalling functions. In its absence muscle contraction is associated with cycles of damage, repair, inflammation and fibrosis with eventual loss of muscle and replacement with fat. Experiments in animal models of DMD have generated a number of different approaches to the induction of dystrophin including viral vector mediated delivery of a recombinant dystrophin gene, antisense oligonucleotide mediated exon-skipping to restore the open reading frame in the dystrophin mRNA, read-through of premature stop mutations, genome modification using CRISPR-Cas9 or cell based transfer of a functional dystrophin gene. In all cases, it will be important to understand how much dystrophin expression is required for a clinically effective therapy and this review examines the data from humans and animal models to estimate the percentage of endogenous dystrophin that is likely to have significant clinical benefit. While there are a number of important caveats to consider, including the appropriate outcome measures, this review suggests that approximately 20% of endogenous levels uniformly distributed within the skeletal muscles and the heart may be sufficient to largely prevent disease progression.

Highlights

  • Introduction toDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked muscle wasting disorder characterised by repeated rounds of muscle degeneration, inflammation and repair

  • A number of different strategies have been developed to restore dystrophin expression in skeletal and cardiac muscles and a wide range of animal models of DMD are available for testing these strategies

  • Data from man and animal models shows that any increase in dystrophin is likely to have some benefit and the more dystrophin the better

Read more

Summary

Histological and gene expression assays in the mouse

Much has been made of changes in muscle pathology and gene expression. These are not in themselves a direct assessment of the functional result of dystrophin induction, but rather are an indirect assessment that can be misleading. Changes in gene expression have been used to infer a functional benefit but some quantitative RTPCR studies are marred by the wrong choice of genes used to normalise the data. A comprehensive analysis of suitable housekeeping genes in normal and dystrophic mice of different ages and different muscles has recently been published (Hildyard et al, 2019)

Conscious Functional assays in the mouse
Muscle physiology in the mouse
Assessments in the dystrophic dog
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call