Abstract

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the entire gastrointestinal tract. Complications caused by CD, including strictures, perforations, and fistulas, often lead patients to undergo surgery, including intestinal resection. Several studies have reported that 50-80% of CD patients undergo the surgery during their lifetime.1 In Korea, Ye et al. reported that the cumulative probability of intestinal resection at 1, 5, and 10-15 years after a diagnosis of CD was 15.5%, 25.0%, and 32.8%, respectively.2 In a more extensive study by Park et al., the cumulative probability of intestinal resection at 10, 20, and 30 years after a diagnosis of CD was 43.5%, 70.0%, and 76.1%, respectively.3 These data suggest that the intestinal resection rate of Korean CD patients is not lower than that of Western patients and that Korean CD patients may, in fact, have a similar clinical course to Western CD patients. However, intestinal resection does not cure CD, and many patients suffer from postoperative recurrences of the disease. The recurrence of disease necessitates repeated intestinal resection, with up to 50% of patients undergoing additional surgery after 20 years.4 Ye et al. also reported that 30.8% of the patients who received an intestinal operation required a repeat operation after 10 years.2 Postoperative recurrence can be defined as clinical recurrence or endoscopic recurrence. Postoperative endoscopic recurrence (PER), which is usually quantified using a Rutgeerts scoring system,5 typically precedes clinical recurrence and PER was reported to occur in almost 58% of CD patients within 1 year of intestinal resection.6 In this issue, Lee et al. conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the factors influencing and recurrence rates of postoperative CD.7 Thirty-four patients who were regularly followed-up for at least 1 year after intestinal resection were analyzed. The mean follow-up period after intestinal resection was 65.4 months and their results showed a cumulative clinical recurrence rate of 8.8%, 12.5%, and 33.5% at 1, 2, and 4 years, respectively. Among 21 patients who had received colonoscopy after their intestinal resection, the cumulative PER was 42.9% and 66.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Therefore, 27 out of 34 patients (79.1%) showed clinical or endoscopic recurrence after intestinal resection. Although the sample size in this study was small, and the duration of follow-up was relatively short, these results are comparable with data from Western countries. Given the increased incidence of CD in Korea and the resulting increase in intestinal resection, the prevention and management of postoperative recurrence is an important issue for Korean clinicians. As such, Lee et al.'s study-which is the first to report the recurrence rate and risk factors for CD after intestinal resection in Korea-is of particular relevance.7 A risk-stratified strategy involving tailored therapy according to high/low risk patient groups in order to prevent postoperative recurrence of CD was recently proposed. This postoperative management strategy included determining the risk factors of patients, identifying PER by performing colonoscopy 6-12 months after surgery, and promptly introducing preventive medications in order to reduce the recurrence rate. High-risk factors included smoking, perforating behavior, perianal disease, young age, repetitive surgery, and extensive bowel disease.8 In contrast, low-risk factors included the stricture behavior and old age at diagnosis. Until now, 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) and probiotics have not been proven to be effective in preventing postoperative recurrence of CD, whilst metronidazole has shown short-term benefits (3 months). Azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (AZT/6-MP) has been proven to be effective and combined therapy with metronidazole and AZT/6-MP was more effective than metronidazole alone. In this issue, Lee et al. also demonstrated that patients who took immunomodulators to prevent postoperative recurrence had significantly lower recurrence rates than the 5-ASA group (P=0.042).7 These results are comparable with the large scale study by Park et al. in which early use of AZT was associated with a significantly delayed requirement for intestinal resection (hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% confidence interval: 0.46-0.85).3 Recent studies have also focused on the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists in treating and preventing PER, especially in high-risk patients. TNF-α antagonist therapy (including infliximab and adalimumab) seemed more effective than AZT in preventing and treating PER in many studies.9,10 Despite these studies being performed with few patients and without long-term follow-up, and although safety and cost issues should also be considered, the use of TNF-α antagonists is currently recommended as appropriate treatment in the high-risk patient group. In Korea, the efficacy of TNF-α antagonists in preventing the postoperative recurrence of CD has not yet been reported. Therefore, prospective large-scale studies are needed to clarify the burden of postoperative recurrence of CD and to determine the high-risk factors of recurrence in Korean CD patients. Furthermore, the efficacy of TNF-α antagonists in improving the long-term prognosis and quality of life of high-risk patients should be further investigated.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.