What is the impact of aerobic fitness and movement interventions on low-flow-mediated vasoconstriction? A systematic review of observational and intervention studies.

Abstract

The cardiovascular benefits of physical exercise are well established. The vasoreactivity that occurs during reductions in local arterial blood flow, termed low-flow-mediated constriction (L-FMC), is a measure of endothelial-dependent vasoconstrictor function. It is unclear whether aerobic fitness and movement (or lack thereof) influences L-FMC. We systematically reviewed studies examining the impact of physical behaviours on L-FMC. To be included, cross-sectional and interventional studies had to examine the impact of a physical behaviour on L-FMC in adults. There were no language or date of publication restrictions. Sources were searched in May, 2021 and included Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. National Institutes of Health quality assessment tools were used. Fourteen studies (15 arms; 313 participants; 398 total observations from four arteries) met the inclusion criteria. The study quality varied from four out of 14 (controlled intervention scoring) to nine out of 12 (longitudinal intervention with no control group scoring) with the total points dependent upon the study design. Conflicting results were reported for acute prolonged sitting studies (attenuated L-FMC: n = 1; no change: n = 1) and resistance exercise (increased L-FMC: n = 2; no change: n = 2). Most observational studies examining aerobic fitness (3/4 studies) and aerobic exercise interventions (4/5 studies) observed a favourable effect on L-FMC. Overall, the included studies support that higher aerobic fitness and engaging in aerobic exercise training may augment L-FMC responses. Our systematic review highlights the heterogeneity between studies and identifies current gaps and future directions to better our understanding of (in)activity, exercise, and posture on endothelial vasoconstrictor function. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42021248241.