Abstract

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFis) have revolutionized the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), however despite considerable progress, only a small proportion of patients maintain long-term clinical response. Selection of, and switching between, biologics is mainly empirical, experiential, and not evidence-based. Most biopharmaceutical proteins (BP) can induce an immune response against the foreign protein component. Immunogenicity and the development of anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) is considered one of the main reasons for loss of therapeutic efficacy (secondary failure). ADAs may neutralize and/or promote clearance of circulating BP with resultant low serum drug levels, loss of clinical response, poor drug survival and adverse events, such as infusion reactions. ADA identification is technically difficult and not standardized, making interpretation of immunogenicity data from published clinical studies challenging. Trough TNFi drug levels correlate with clinical outcomes, exhibiting a “concentration-response” relationship. Measurement of ADA and drug levels may improve patient care and improve cost-effectiveness of BP use. However, in the absence of clinically-validated, reliable assays and consensus guidelines, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and immunogenicity testing have not been widely adopted in routine clinical practice in Rheumatology. Here we discuss the utility and relevance of TDM and immunogenicity testing of TNFis in RA (focusing on the most widely used TNFis globally, with the most available data, i.e., infliximab, adalimumab, and etanercept), the limitations of currently available assays and potential future immunopharmacological strategies to personalize disease management.

Highlights

  • Biologic agents, such as TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis), have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but despite this advance, not all patients respond favorably

  • Immunogenicity is defined as the ability of biopharmaceutical products (BPs) to induce an immune response, resulting in

  • TNFis are often selected as first-line biologic therapy in patients with RA who are refractory to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), due to the availability of long-term data from clinical trials and extensive real world experience

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Biologic agents, such as TNF-α inhibitors (TNFis), have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but despite this advance, not all patients respond favorably. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and immunogenicity testing, using trough drug levels and ADAs, have the potential to improve clinical decision-making, by influencing drug selection, dose, and frequency of administration. This may allow clinicians to reduce under- and over- treatment for patients in clinical relapse or remission. TNFis (in combination with methotrexate and as monotherapy) are often selected as first-line biologic therapy in patients with RA who are refractory to non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), due to the availability of long-term data from clinical trials and extensive real world experience. We discuss the utility and clinical relevance of TDM and immunogenicity testing of TNFis in patients with RA, and potential future immunopharmacological strategies to personalize disease management

Consequences of Immunogenicity
Factors Influencing Immunogenicity
Limitations of Immunogenicity Testing
CURRENT CLINICAL PRACTICE
Drug level op mal ADA tes ng not required
Findings
POTENTIAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGICAL ALGORITHM
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call