What is the best predictor of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease: mean, variability of HbA1c or HbA1c-Hemoglobin ratio?

Abstract

AimLimitations in the measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) result in uncertainty about the best predictor of mortality among these patients. Our study aimed to determine the association between the mean and average real variability (ARV) of HbA1c, as well as HbA1c-hemoglobin (HH) ratio with mortality among patients with T2D and CKD.Materials and methodsWe identified 16,868 T2D patients with stage 3 or above CKD from outpatient visits during 2003–2018. We ascertained all-cause and cardiovascular mortality through linkage to Taiwan’s National Death Registry. Mortality rates were estimated using the Poisson distribution, and we conducted Cox proportional hazards regressions to assess relative risks of mortality corresponding to the mean HbA1c, ARV of HbA1c and HH ratio.ResultsCompared to patients with a mean HbA1c of 7.0–7.9%, a mean HbA1c < 7.0% was persistently associated with highest risk of all-cause but not cardiovascular mortality after adjusting for confounders. On the contrary, patients with HbA1c-ARV in the second to fourth quartiles and HH ratios in the higher quartiles showed increased risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality compared to those in the first quartiles.ConclusionsHbA1c-ARV was more effective than mean HbA1c or HH ratio in predicting mortality in T2D patients with CKD. Apart from optimal glucose control, multidisciplinary care focusing on glycemic variability is essential for reducing mortality in these patients.