Abstract

Previous research has speculated that semantic diversity and lexical ambiguity may be closely related constructs. Our research sought to test this claim in respect of the semantic diversity measure proposed by Hoffman et al. (2013). To this end, we replicated the procedure described by Hoffman et al., Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730 (2013) for computing multidimensional representations of contextual information using Latent Semantic Analysis, and from these we derived semantic diversity values for 28,555 words. We then replicated the facilitatory effect of semantic diversity on word recognition using existing data resources and observed this effect to be greater for low-frequency words. Yet, we found no relationship between this measure and lexical ambiguity effects in word recognition. Further analysis of the LSA-based contextual representations used to compute Hoffman et al. (2013) measure of semantic diversity revealed that they do not capture the distinct meanings of ambiguous words. Instead, these contextual representations appear to capture general information about the topics and types of written material in which words occur. These analyses suggest that the semantic diversity metric previously proposed by Hoffman et al. (2013) facilitates word recognition because high-diversity words are likely to have been encountered no matter what one has read, whereas many participants may not have encountered lower-diversity words simply because the topics and types of written material in which they occur are more restricted.

Highlights

  • Previous research has speculated that semantic diversity and lexical ambiguity may be closely related constructs

  • The English Lexicon Project (ELP) consists of trial-level lexical decision and reading aloud data for 40,481 words collected from 444 participants, while the British Lexical Project (BLP) consists of trial-level lexical decision data for 28,730 words from 78 participants

  • Semantic diversity measures for 28,555 words were computed following the corpus analysis described in the previous section, while word frequency estimates retrieved were based on the British National Corpus (Van Heuven, Mandera, Keuleers, & Brysbaert, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Previous research has speculated that semantic diversity and lexical ambiguity may be closely related constructs. Further analysis of the LSA-based contextual representations used to compute Hoffman et al (2013) measure of semantic diversity revealed that they do not capture the distinct meanings of ambiguous words. Instead, these contextual representations appear to capture general information about the topics and types of written material in which words occur. If variation in contextual usage of a word reflects variation in semantic meaning, these constructs might be measuring the same thing

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.