Abstract

After completing this article, readers should be able to: 1. Define the indeterminate class of recommendations for neonatal resuscitation. 2. Describe the two areas of current investigation within the indeterminate class recommendations. 3. Describe the application of two techniques from other settings within the indeterminate class recommendations. 4. Describe the indeterminate class recommendation for which conflicting evidence is emerging. With the shift to evidence-based guidelines, the process of revising the scientific framework for neonatal resuscitation and the derivative educational efforts will become more predictable and accessible. Beginning with the International Guidelines 2000, an Indeterminate Class of recommendations appeared. These focused on areas of intense scientific research that may lead to clinically important therapies; technological developments widely adopted for use in other age groups that may find a role in neonatal resuscitation; or emerging evidence that conflicts substantially with previous data, resulting in a revision of recommendations to withdraw support of a particular therapeutic approach. The advent of changes in evidence-based guidelines carries the obligation to monitor the impact of such changes. Finally, entirely new questions and proposed guideline recommendations will be submitted to evidence evaluation in the future. Five Indeterminate Class recommendations appeared in the neonatal resuscitation portion of the International Guidelines 2000 (Table⇓ ). Cerebral hypothermia following hypoxic-ischemic insult and positive-pressure ventilation with room air represent proposals in the translational research phase, moving from animal and molecular models into clinical trials. The recommendations relating to adjunctive airway techniques, laryngeal mask airway and exhaled carbon dioxide detection, recognize the importance of these techniques in the older pediatric and adult populations, but acknowledge the significant limitations in their application to neonates. The statement regarding high-dose epinephrine reinforces the conflicting nature of evidence relating to this therapy, yet it acknowledges that available evidence is extrapolated largely from older age groups and falls short of supporting …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call