Abstract
ABSTRACT A critical review of state-of-the-art methods of acidification mitigation in North America, Norway, and Sweden reveals a common base of knowledge among the programs; however, differences in implementation philosophy are apparent. The use of mathematical models, calculation routines, and systematic analyses in water and watershed acidification mitigation is critically studied and the impacts of the inherent assumptions and simplifications are discussed. Several areas where present methods do meet the defined goals of the operational liming programs are described. Other areas where more accurate knowledge would be desirable are also identified, including the interaction of aluminum chemistry, soil chemistry, and liming; the effects of hydrological changes; and the conditions for dissolution of neutralization agents under actual field application.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
