Abstract
The category of the sacred has been used in the scholarly vocabulary of comparative religion as a referent to the transcendent worlds which religious behavior is directed to. The methodological value of the sacred as a scholarly concept has, however, been generally con sidered more descriptive than analytical.' The historians of religion have been content to consider the sacred as a designation for the transcendent reality which becomes manifest in the world of human societies in variegated forms of religious experiences and expressions within the institutional or non-institutional settings. From the per spective of phenomenology of religion the recurring patterns of the sacred receive their social grounding in mythical narratives and in ritual systems of representation, which in turn create conditions for religious discourses and emotional responses within the cultural sys tems of symbols in question.2 During the last fifteen years there has emerged a new interest among scholars of religion to reflect and assess the value of the sacred as a scholarly concept—most notably by W. Richard Comstock, Hans H. Penner, Carsten Colpe, William E. Paden and Carol E. Burnside.3 However, as Penner has emphasized, no one has managed to set the sacred in a wider theoretical context (1989: 24). Besides the culture-specific accounts of linguists and anthropologists, Comstock and Paden are perhaps the only scholars whose discussion on the
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.