Abstract
From the post-World War II period to date, books about the problems of underdeveloped countries have contained introductory sections discussing what should be understood by underdeveloped, developing, or some other diplomatic euphemism and, more fundamentally, what the development of such a country should mean. Often it has been concluded that a fully satisfactory definition cannot be provided; we may have to settle for specifying one or several indicators of something which has to be left rather hazy. I have never been satisfied by these explanations. The first requirement of a scientific analyst is that he should clearly define the concepts he is utilizing.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.