Abstract
This article responds to William J. Stuntz’s 2001 article, The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law. Stuntz describes the shift of power over sentencing from judges to prosecutors as “pathological.” I argue that the shift is part of a more general shift in governmental powers toward the executive branch, and that the shift serves the legitimate function of making criminal law more responsive to legitimate expectations of the public. Legal judgments about crimes and criminals must match the public’s moral judgments, and prosecutorial discretion serves this decidedly non-pathological function.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
