Abstract
The news item above reports on the sighting of a planet outside our solar system, the first time such a discovery has been made. As with many scientific discoveries, however, things are not quite as simple as they seem. The problem with this discovery is that the two groups of astronomers invoked cannot quite agree on who saw what first. Or to put it another way: When is a planet not a planet but a Brown Dwarf and when is a discovery not a discovery but a confirmation? Astronomers from the U.S. Naval Observatory and the University of Arizona are having a little trouble sorting this out.Both groups do agree on the data. A substellar body has been directly and indirectly observed orbiting the intrinsically faint star Van Biesbroeck 8 (VB S) in a constellation of the Milky Way. In fact, both groups agree that the observed substellar body can be called a Brown Dwarf. The definition of a Brown Dwarf, it is agreed, lies somewhere in between the definition of a planet and that of a star. Herein lies the crux: can a Brown Dwarf be called a planet? Richard Harrington, an astronomer with the U.S. Naval Observatory, says that a Brown Dwarf is not a planet. Donald McCarthy, of the University of Arizona, says that it is.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.