Abstract

ABSTRACT Much recent work in cognitive science and psychology has rediscovered the James-Lange hypothesis, which grounds affect in physiological states and processes. This article complements such an approach in a very different manner, through the computational analysis of large historical datasets. Rather than focusing attention upon the singular affective body […]’. By so doing, it seeks to extend James’s theory of emotion across much larger temporal and spatial scales. Rather than focusing attention upon the singular affective body, I examine a much wider cultural body – the hundreds of thousands of texts collected under Eighteenth Century Collections Online – in order to demonstrate the changing discourse on physiological affect. Computational modelling, I demonstrate, enables us to extend scholarly attention beyond canonical texts so as to consider more obscured or miscellaneous literature, ranging from surgical journals to midwifery manuals. By focusing upon a series of key words and terms – ‘irritability’, ‘sensibility’, ‘mental emotion’ – I demonstrate that such overlooked material anticipated the James-Lange hypothesis in unsuspected ways. I conclude by making a number of speculative analogies between the distributed nature of computational enquiry, on the one hand, and the distributed nature of embodied feeling, on the other.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call